74
CRL Section 22 Committee — Launch Transcript (MDNtv)
MD
Cited
Whisper-verified transcript of the CRL's Section 22 Committee launch (Rhema Bible Church, 6 Oct 2025): the Chair confirming the committee is "for Christians," that "we don't need a complainant," and "there will be no state regulation of religion," with the committee's umbrella bodies pledging support on camera. Includes the Whisper verification log and candidate quotes.
40
CRL Chair Statements — Transcript
MD
Cited
Verbatim transcript of public statements by CRL Rights Commission Chairperson Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva calling for mandatory church registration, accreditation panels, and state oversight of religious content.
40
CRL Chair — SACD Documentary Footage
Video
Supp
Video documentary segment from South African Christian Democratic coverage of CRL Chairperson's public statements on state church oversight — primary source footage.
106
De Beer v Minister of COGTA — High Court (2020)
HTML
Cited
[2020] ZAGPPHC 184 (2 Jun 2020). The High Court struck down most Level 3/4 lockdown regulations as irrational and unconstitutional, then suspended its own order for 14 days for the Minister to rewrite them. Full judgment text (SAFLII, via Wayback Machine).
108
Esau v Minister of COGTA — SCA (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZASCA 9 (28 Jan 2021). The Supreme Court of Appeal held DMA s27(2) regulations ARE administrative action reviewable under PAJA, and invalidated two measures (exercise hours; hot-food sales). Binding precedent that the regulations were reviewable.
107
Minister of COGTA v De Beer — SCA (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZASCA 95 (1 Jul 2021). The Supreme Court of Appeal reversed the High Court on how the case had been pleaded ("no properly pleaded case") — not on jurisdiction; the regulations stood.
109
FOR SA / SANCF v Minister of COGTA — worship-ban challenge (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZAGPJHC 866 (High Court JHB, Vally J, 13 Dec 2021). The churches' direct challenge to the total ban on religious gatherings: the court declined PAJA review (calling the regulations "executive policy") and dismissed the case as moot once the ban had been lifted — no ruling on the merits.
105
DA v Minister of COGTA — Constitutional Court (2026)
PDF
Cited
[2026] ZACC 8 (27 Feb 2026), 99pp. The Constitutional Court upheld Disaster Management Act s27 as constitutional, holding disaster regulations are subject to judicial review ("an effective remedy"); Matojane J dissented (s27 deficient for want of parliamentary oversight). From the Constitutional Court's own repository.