114
CRL Annual Report 2016/17 — the registration Bills
PDF
Cited
The Commission's own tabled annual report recording that its Legal Services unit produced five amendment Bills, two of them "to regulate the registration of religious organisations, including churches, and ministers of religion" — via the CRL Act, or alternatively the Non-Profit Organisations Act or the Marriage Act. First-party evidence that the Commission knew registration required new law it did not have. Bounded: the Bills appear once in the Commission's reporting and have not been located in Parliament's bill tracker, the Gazette, the CRL website or 217 archived CRL PDFs.
115
CRL Annual Report 2017/18 — the profession analogy
PDF
Cited
Tabled to Parliament. The Commission argues religious leaders should be regulated as professionals: "If all other professions are subjected to a form of regulation, why not the religious sector. If a teacher can be punished and struck off the roll, why is it difficult for religious leaders to be subjected to the same?" The same report prints, unanswered, the objection put to it: "What will happen to a pastor who does not want to belong to a fraternal or an umbrella organisation?"
116
COGTA Portfolio Committee — report on the CRL final report
PDF
Cited
Parliament's committee record of the CRL's 2017 report and recommendations, including the peer-review and registration proposals put to it.
117
CRL Addendum to the Commercialisation Report (24 Feb 2019)
PDF
Cited
The Commission states that if the problems continue government will impose itself, and that "the CRL Rights Act already gives the CRL Commission the right to establish a register" — the proposed changes being "a realisation of the existing powers." Set against the 2016/17 Bills, the Commission drafted legislation to obtain a power it here says it already had.
118
ATC — COGTA Committee Report, 14 February 2018
HTML
Cited
Parliament's Announcements, Tablings and Committee Reports. The Committee recorded the sector's objections — including that "the CRL Rights Commission is not the body that should be regulating the sector" — and recommended legislation anyway: a sector code recognised by legislation, and strengthening laws "like the Non-Profit Organisation Act and the Income Tax Act to ensure registration of religious institutions." A portfolio committee, not Parliament as a whole; tabled to the National Assembly for consideration.
74
CRL Section 22 Committee — Launch Transcript (MDNtv)
MD
Cited
Whisper-verified transcript of the CRL's Section 22 Committee launch (Rhema Bible Church, 6 Oct 2025): the Chair confirming the committee is "for Christians," that "we don't need a complainant," and "there will be no state regulation of religion," with the committee's umbrella bodies pledging support on camera. Includes the Whisper verification log and candidate quotes.
40
CRL Chair Statements — Transcript
MD
Cited
Verbatim transcript of public statements by CRL Rights Commission Chairperson Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva calling for mandatory church registration, accreditation panels, and state oversight of religious content.
40
CRL Chair — SACD Documentary Footage
Video
Supp
Video documentary segment from South African Christian Democratic coverage of CRL Chairperson's public statements on state church oversight — primary source footage.
106
De Beer v Minister of COGTA — High Court (2020)
HTML
Cited
[2020] ZAGPPHC 184 (2 Jun 2020). The High Court struck down most Level 3/4 lockdown regulations as irrational and unconstitutional, then suspended its own order for 14 days for the Minister to rewrite them. Full judgment text (SAFLII, via Wayback Machine).
108
Esau v Minister of COGTA — SCA (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZASCA 9 (28 Jan 2021). The Supreme Court of Appeal held DMA s27(2) regulations ARE administrative action reviewable under PAJA, and invalidated two measures (exercise hours; hot-food sales). Binding precedent that the regulations were reviewable.
107
Minister of COGTA v De Beer — SCA (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZASCA 95 (1 Jul 2021). The Supreme Court of Appeal reversed the High Court on how the case had been pleaded ("no properly pleaded case") — not on jurisdiction; the regulations stood.
109
FOR SA / SANCF v Minister of COGTA — worship-ban challenge (2021)
HTML
Cited
[2021] ZAGPJHC 866 (High Court JHB, Vally J, 13 Dec 2021). The churches' direct challenge to the total ban on religious gatherings: the court declined PAJA review (calling the regulations "executive policy") and dismissed the case as moot once the ban had been lifted — no ruling on the merits.
105
DA v Minister of COGTA — Constitutional Court (2026)
PDF
Cited
[2026] ZACC 8 (27 Feb 2026), 99pp. The Constitutional Court upheld Disaster Management Act s27 as constitutional, holding disaster regulations are subject to judicial review ("an effective remedy"); Matojane J dissented (s27 deficient for want of parliamentary oversight). From the Constitutional Court's own repository.